Can AI spot fake reviews?

Half. It can flag reviews that look suspicious (vague praise, repeated phrases, off-topic details), but it can't prove a review is fake. Treat its flags as warnings, not facts.

Verdict: Half-bot · AI helps, you finish✓ Tested 2 times in Llama 3.3 70B · Nov 5, 2026Written for ChatGPT, Claude or Gemini

Jump to the prompt ↓

Half-bot

01Why half-bot

  • Fake reviews often share patterns AI can notice across many reviews.
  • It can't see reviewer history or purchase records.
  • Real people sometimes write short, generic reviews too.
Sponsor slot · openFeatured tool for this task. A labeled card for one relevant tool.
Book this spot →

02The prompt

Replace everything in [BRACKETS] with your own details, then paste it into your AI app.

prompt.txt
You are a consumer researcher who looks for fake reviews.

Product: [PRODUCT]
Reviews (paste 20 or more, with dates and star ratings if shown): [REVIEWS]

Your task: flag reviews that may not be genuine.

Rules:
- MUST explain the specific pattern behind each flag (repeated wording, same-day bursts, no product details).
- MUST call them 'possibly fake', never 'fake'.
- MUST summarize what the unflagged reviews say.

Give me: a list of flagged reviews with reasons, and a summary of the rest.

03Steps

  1. Copy reviews with dates and ratings.
  2. Run the prompt.
  3. Weigh the unflagged reviews more heavily.

04What can go wrong

  • False positives happen; don't accuse anyone based on this.
  • A small sample makes patterns unreliable.

05What to use

Any major AI chat app.

06Our test runs

2 runs, each with a different made-up sample. 1 of 2 passed every check.

Run 1 · Llama 3.3 70B · graded by GPT-OSS 120BOct 10, 2026Passed with a catch

The made-up sample:

  • [PRODUCT]EcoBrew Reusable Coffee Filter – a stainless‑steel, 100 % BPA‑free filter for drip coffee makers. Fits standard basket sizes, reusable up to 1,000 brews, claimed to reduce paper waste and improve flavor. Includes a silicone seal and cleaning brush.
  • [REVIEWS]2024-09-12 ★5: Works great. 2024-09-12 ★5: Works great. 2024-09-13 ★1: Broken after first use. 2024-09-14 ★4: Good taste, easy clean. 2024-09-14 ★4: Good taste, easy clean. 2024-09-15 ★5: Love it! 2024-09-15 ★5: Love it! 2024-09-15 ★5: Love it! 2024-09-16 ★2: Too small. 2024-09-16 ★2: Too small. 2024-09-17 ★3: Average. 2024-09-18 ★5: Perfect. 2024-09-18 ★5: Perfect. 2024-09-19 ★4: Nice. 2024-09-20 ★5: Excellent. 2024-09-20 ★5: Excellent. 2024-09-21 ★1: Smells metal. 2024-09-22 ★5: Highly recommend. 2024-09-22 ★5: Highly recommend. 2024-09-23 ★3: Okay. 2024-09-24 ★5: Best filter. 2024-09-24 ★5: Best filter.
  • Must call flagged reviews 'possibly fake'
  • Must explain specific pattern for each flag
  • Must summarize unflagged reviews
  • Provide list of flagged reviews with reasons
  • Didn't make up details we never gave it

What came back (excerpt):

After analyzing the reviews, I have flagged the following as possibly fake: 1. 2024-09-12 ★5: Works great. and 2024-09-12 ★5: Works great. - These two reviews have the same wording and were posted on the same day, which raises suspicions of duplicate or artificially generated reviews.
Read the full answer
After analyzing the reviews, I have flagged the following as possibly fake:

1. 2024-09-12 ★5: Works great. and 2024-09-12 ★5: Works great. - These two reviews have the same wording and were posted on the same day, which raises suspicions of duplicate or artificially generated reviews.
2. 2024-09-14 ★4: Good taste, easy clean. and 2024-09-14 ★4: Good taste, easy clean. - Similar to the previous pair, these two reviews have identical wording and were posted on the same day, indicating possible duplication.
3. 2024-09-15 ★5: Love it!, 2024-09-15 ★5: Love it!, and 2024-09-15 ★5: Love it! - Three reviews with the same wording posted on the same day is a strong indication of possibly fake reviews, as it suggests a coordinated effort to create multiple positive reviews in a short time frame.
4. 2024-09-16 ★2: Too small. and 2024-09-16 ★2: Too small. - Another pair of same-day, identical reviews, which may indicate artificial review generation.
5. 2024-09-18 ★5: Perfect. and 2024-09-18 ★5: Perfect. - Same-day duplicate reviews with the same wording, which could be a sign of possibly fake reviews.
6. 2024-09-20 ★5: Excellent. and 2024-09-20 ★5: Excellent. - Again, same-day duplicate reviews with identical wording, which raises suspicions of artificial review generation.
7. 2024-09-22 ★5: Highly recommend. and 2024-09-22 ★5: Highly recommend. - Same-day duplicate reviews with the same wording, which may indicate possibly fake reviews.
8. 2024-09-24 ★5: Best filter. and 2024-09-24 ★5: Best filter. - The final pair of same-day duplicate reviews with identical wording, which could be a sign of possibly fake reviews.

The unflagged reviews provide a range of opinions about the EcoBrew Reusable Coffee Filter. Some reviewers praise the product for its ease of use, good taste, and eco-friendliness (e.g., 2024-09-14 ★4: Good taste, easy clean.). Others mention issues with the product, such as it being broken after the first use (2024-09-13 ★1: Broken after first use.), smelling like metal (2024-09-21 ★1: Smells metal.), or being too small (2024-09-16 ★2: Too small.). A few reviewers provide more neutral assessments, describing the product as "average" (2024-09-17 ★3: Average.) or "okay" (2024-09-23 ★3: Okay.). Overall, the unflagged reviews suggest that the product has both positive and negative aspects, and that individual experiences may vary.

Check that every flagged entry is explicitly labeled 'possibly fake'.

Run 2 · Llama 3.3 70B · graded by GPT-OSS 120BNov 5, 2026Passed

The made-up sample (a messier one):

  • [PRODUCT]EcoBrew Reusable Coffee Filter – Bamboo Mesh, 3‑Cup
  • [REVIEWS]2024-03-12 ★★★★★ Great taste, no paper waste! 2024-03-12 ★★★★★ Love it, fits my 3‑cup pot perfectly. 2024-03-13 ★★★★★ Easy clean, coffee richer. 2024-03-13 ★★★★★ Works as described. 2024-03-14 ★★★★★ Best filter ever!! 2024-03-14 ★★★★★ So cheap, love it. 2024-03-15 ★★★★★ Amazing, saves money. 2024-03-15 ★★★★★ Great. 2024-03-16 ★★★★★ Perfect for office. 2024-03-16 ★★★★★ No more paper. 2024-03-17 ★★★★★ Nice. 2024-03-17 ★★★★★ Good. 2024-03-18 ★★★★★ Works great. 2024-03-19 ★★★★★ Very happy. 2024-03-20 ★★★★★ Excellent. 2024-03-20 ★★★★★ I recommend. 2024-03-21 ★★★★★ Love the bamboo. 2024-03-21 ★★★★★ Great filter. 2024-03-22 ★★★★★ Simple and clean. 2024-03-22 ★★★★★ Works. 2024-03-23 ★★★★★ Nice product. 2024-03-23 ★★★★★ Good.
  • Explain specific pattern behind each flag
  • Use the term 'possibly fake' and never say 'fake'
  • Summarize the unflagged reviews
  • Provide a list of flagged reviews with reasons and a summary
  • Didn't make up details we never gave it

What came back (excerpt):

After analyzing the reviews, I have flagged the following as possibly fake: 1. 2024-03-12 ★★★★★ Great taste, no paper waste! 2024-03-12 ★★★★★ Love it, fits my 3‑cup pot perfectly. (Same-day burst: Two 5-star reviews on the same day, which is unusual and may indicate coordinated or artificial reviews.)
Read the full answer
After analyzing the reviews, I have flagged the following as possibly fake:

1. 2024-03-12 ★★★★★ Great taste, no paper waste! 
   2024-03-12 ★★★★★ Love it, fits my 3‑cup pot perfectly. 
   (Same-day burst: Two 5-star reviews on the same day, which is unusual and may indicate coordinated or artificial reviews.)

2. 2024-03-14 ★★★★★ Best filter ever!! 
   2024-03-14 ★★★★★ So cheap, love it. 
   (Same-day burst: Another instance of two 5-star reviews on the same day, raising suspicions of artificial reviews.)

3. 2024-03-15 ★★★★★ Amazing, saves money. 
   2024-03-15 ★★★★★ Great. 
   (Same-day burst and lack of product details: Two reviews on the same day, with one being very brief and lacking specific details about the product.)

4. 2024-03-16 ★★★★★ Perfect for office. 
   2024-03-16 ★★★★★ No more paper. 
   (Same-day burst and lack of product details: Similar to the previous point, these reviews are brief and lack specifics, and their same-day posting is suspicious.)

5. 2024-03-17 ★★★★★ Nice. 
   2024-03-17 ★★★★★ Good. 
   (Lack of product details and same-day burst: These reviews are extremely brief and do not provide any useful information about the product, and their same-day posting raises suspicions.)

6. 2024-03-20 ★★★★★ Excellent. 
   2024-03-20 ★★★★★ I recommend. 
   (Same-day burst and lack of product details: Similar to previous points, these reviews lack specifics and are posted on the same day, which may indicate they are not genuine.)

7. 2024-03-21 ★★★★★ Love the bamboo. 
   2024-03-21 ★★★★★ Great filter. 
   (Same-day burst: While these reviews provide a bit more detail, their same-day posting still raises suspicions of being possibly fake.)

8. 2024-03-22 ★★★★★ Simple and clean. 
   2024-03-22 ★★★★★ Works. 
   (Same-day burst and lack of product details: These reviews are brief and lack specifics, and their posting on the same day is suspicious.)

9. 2024-03-23 ★★★★★ Nice product. 
   2024-03-23 ★★★★★ Good. 
   (Same-day burst and lack of product details: Similar to previous points, these reviews are brief, lack specifics, and are posted on the same day, which may indicate they are not genuine.)

The unflagged reviews generally express satisfaction with the product, mentioning its ease of use, the quality of the coffee it produces, and its environmental benefits (e.g., reducing paper waste). They provide some specific details about the product's performance and features, such as fitting perfectly in a 3-cup pot, being easy to clean, and producing richer coffee. These reviews seem to provide genuine feedback about the product's functionality and the users' experiences with it.

Check that each flagged entry cites a clear pattern and uses 'possibly fake'.

How each run works: we fill the prompt with a made-up sample, run it once in Llama 3.3 70B, and GPT-OSS 120B grades the answer against the prompt's own rules. Word limits are counted by code, and every quote flagged as made up is checked against the full answer. Your results can differ. How we test.

Prompt packSmart Shopping 10 step-by-step prompts that go further than this one, $9.
See what’s inside →